Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
I would like to offer this as a feature on “Traditional Printmaking” with a view to bringing about an awareness of this lesser known, maybe somewhat neglected art form, (lesser known here at DA) and to let others know that traditional printmaking is alive here at deviantART.

Firstly I feel there is a need to clarify the difference between the terms "print" and  “Traditional Printmaking” as used here at DA and possibly at other art sites around the web as well.

Prints = Any artwork or photograph that has been uploaded at a high enough resolution to be purchased in some form be it on a flat 2 dimensional surface or on a surface such as a mug or t-shirt.  These are photomechanical reproductions of original artworks.

Traditional Printmaking = Artwork that has been created by transferring an impression from one object onto another two-dimensional surface.  For example, as from wood with the creation of a woodblock print, from metal in the creation of an etching or from the many other inkable surfaces that can be used as a matrix for a traditional print.  These are original artworks.

Printmaking is one of the oldest and most basic of art forms.  Palaeontologists have found the oldest known "prints" when they discovered dinosaur foot impressions in earth that was once wet clay.  

From the time of the ancient Chinese and from Dürer artists have used and developed methods of reproducing images on paper.  These fine art print techniques have developed and continued to evolved over time.

Forensic scientists use the most basic of printmaking tools to help solve crimes when they take and look at human fingerprints during the course of their investigations.

One of the first pieces of art a child can do is a handprint. Left to their own devices to find their materials, their end product might not be terribly desired by mom and might result in some cleaning house, but it is creative non-the less. Finger painting comes to mind here as well. I will let you imagine all the other permutations of these early artistic endeavors.  

Traditional printmaking techniques fall into four categories.

  1. RELIEF – Woodcut, Linocut and some Collographs
  2. INTAGLIO – Etching, Drypoint, Mezzotint, Aquatint
  3. SERIGRAPHY – Silkscreen
  4. PLANOGRAPHIC – Lithography

There is also Monotype – Any print or mixture of print techniques that produces a “one off” print.  Some collographs may fit here as well. This whatisaprint.com/ is also useful to help understand what traditional printmaking is.

Here at DA there are listed under “Traditional Printmaking” the following print types that we can classify our submissions into.  
    Collagraph Dry Needle? – Drypoint is the correct term for this. Etching Lino Lithograph Monotype Silk Screen Woodblock

If your having trouble finding these categories then try in the first instance looking under “Text & Typography”. For some reason someone seems to think Traditional Printmaking belongs there – maybe they equate the word "print" with “text” as in printing = writing.  But anyway this is where you will find Traditional Printmaking here at DA.

To follow are some examples of the great creative work that has been and is being uploaded to this area at DA.  I have tried to provide, with them some basic explanation of what each print type involves.

Collagraph – is a print taken from a collage of materials that have been clued or adhered to a supporting surface.  They can be simple or very rich in texture.
Some might also classify prints done with a mixture of print types as a collagraph.  These mixture prints could sometimes be classified as monotype as well possibly.

Garden by Adelaida  resonance by stigmatattoo   Something Fishy by HelenParkinson  Collagraph - Meet Market by JetJames  

Drypoint  (not dryneedle as listed) – Both this and etching could come under a broader heading of intaglio printmaking.  Intaglio prints all have the image to be printed below the surface of the plate. With drypoint the lines and tones are hand-scratched into the surface of the plate with the lines and burr holding the ink.  In most cases the traditional surface to do this on is metal.  Zinc and copper are two of the most common metals used with a more readily available option being Perspex.

Carys by Catharsisky  pigbee man by terezarsm   Ratty by Go-Angel

Engraving and mezzotint could also be included in this category possibly as they both are dry techniques.  Engraving is crisper and cleaner than drypoint. Mezzotint involves the whole surface of the plate having a fine even texture added to it. The artist then scrapes and burnishes the surface to make varying degrees of smooth surfaces that will result in lighter shades when printed.

Shoes by guitarsallly  coming to terms by yohabroha  Some mezzotint examples.

Etching – Another print type that should be under the broader heading of intaglio printmaking.  Acid and acid resistant grounds are used to create the image on the plate for this printmaking method.

:thumb57281275:  Dizzy Leaves by thuja  Pink Orchids by HelenParkinson  Blood Shark by bigredsharks

Lino – These are relief prints done from a plate that has had the image cut or gouged into it and then the raised surface is inked with the cut image being the white or lighter areas of the print.  Potato prints done as a child work in the same manner, as do woodblock prints and stamps.

:thumb51132723:   inside out by PunkDisaster   Linoleum Dreamscape by TaxiOnna

Lithograph – this print form is based on the concept that grease and water don’t mix.  The image is developed with materials that have an affinity to grease.  Special litho pencils, crayons, wax crayons and liquid tusche are among some of the things that can be used to create the greasy image on the surface. The stone or metal with the image on it is then sponged down and inked. The ink sticks to the greasy image and is repelled by the wet areas with no image on them.  The print is then taken.  

Ampolletas y Alambres by arti-fundios   Ladybug, Ladybug by tribs28  Blue Kitty by Electrikshock

Monotype – mono meaning “one” so these types of prints are one off prints.  Traditionally they can be subtractive (reductive) – the surface is completely inked and ink is wiped away and then printed, or additive (direct) where the image is painted or applied directly to the surface and then printed.  However any print or combination of print techniques that produces only one print impression can come into this category.

  Factory Girl by goosehonker   Beach Find 3 by HelenParkinson

Silk Screen – This uses stencils of one form or another with a screen where the ink is forced through the stencil to reveal the image on the printed surface.  Stencils can be cut or created with emulsions.  

Snowdrops 2 by kickass-peanut  a quick step by kiati2000   Damien Rice poster by JasonGoad

Woodblock – As with lino prints these are created with lines being cut or gouged out of the surface.  These marks form the white or light areas when the plate is inked on the raised surface and then printed.  Reduction prints are a process where by several layers are printed on top of each other with more cutting into the surface occurring between registrations.

Zebra Resting by bekaboo   Firey Ginkgos by mLeeFineArt  untitled dead poet woodcut by stigmatattoo  Seafood Print by HelenParkinson


There are a few places that one can go here on DA to find and view good traditional prints.  There are a couple of groups that cater to this art form.  :iconprintmakers: & :iconprintmakingclub:

One of the newest traditional art gallery directors has a wonderful collection of traditional prints. :iconstigmatattoo:  If you want to see just his prints then follow this browse.deviantart.com/?catpath… would also be the best person to recommend any traditional prints for a daily deviation as well. :)

Thank you for your time in reading this and I hope it has been of interest.
Add a Comment:
 
:icondaicelf:
Daicelf Featured By Owner Dec 16, 2007  Professional General Artist
I have always thought the term "original print" sufficed to differentiate between handpulled and photomechanical / digital "reproduction"images.
Reply
:iconseanathan:
seanathan Featured By Owner Oct 9, 2007  Student
shouldn't collagraph be put under intaglio since it utilizes printing FROM the groove?
Reply
:iconcatharsisky:
Catharsisky Featured By Owner Oct 26, 2007
It doesn't always though.
We were taught it was a relief, I know you ink it more like an intaglio... but you can also do a surface roll, and it does sit on top of the plate, and it certainly all ways worked better for me in the relief press than the intaglio press. Meh! Splitting hairs!
Reply
:iconpdrydia:
pdRydia Featured By Owner Aug 21, 2007
I didn't know dA had a category for etchings--thanks for the article. :]
Reply
:iconkarincharlotte:
karincharlotte Featured By Owner Aug 12, 2007   Traditional Artist
Excellent article, Helen! Thanks for making me aware that there is another art form out there, that deserves more attention.
I have been lucky enough to try various forms of printmaking in High-school, but it has been a long time, due to the cost and space needed to create prints. You certainly inpired me to revisit printmaking as a possible means of making art. Your article did point out that printmaking can be simple (even kids can do it).
Warm regards!
Karin :heart: :wave:
Reply
:iconlayla-c:
Layla-c Featured By Owner Aug 3, 2007
:heart:
Reply
:icondragounlady:
Dragounlady Featured By Owner Jul 28, 2007
I love the article.
I have found printmaking facinating ever scince I took a course in it in collage.
I have a few prints, mostly drypoint, posted. I'd love to make more but it's hard to get a hold of a press, LOL.
I would suggest that anyone who can get a chance should try printmaking, theres a style for almost anyone.
Reply
:iconselfishtears:
selfishtears Featured By Owner Jul 27, 2007  Professional Photographer
thanks for the article... I've been experimenting with printmaking a bit recently. Lino printing is fun.
Reply
:iconorchidorca:
Orchidorca Featured By Owner Jul 21, 2007  Professional Traditional Artist
Brings you back to basics after being lost in this digital world. Great article! :painter:
Reply
:icondreamimesis:
dreamimesis Featured By Owner Jul 21, 2007   Interface Designer
great article. really inspiring. thanx
Reply
:iconyohabroha:
yohabroha Featured By Owner Jul 16, 2007  Professional Traditional Artist
Wow you featured my print "coming to terms" in the mezzotint category!!!

Thanks a lot!!

Great article too, i'm glad this information was put out for the public!
Reply
:iconlittleblackduck:
littleblackduck Featured By Owner Jul 12, 2007
Oh, and really informative article! Thanks!
Reply
:iconlittleblackduck:
littleblackduck Featured By Owner Jul 12, 2007
Printmaker here!!! :D
Reply
:iconslinkydink:
slinkydink Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007   Photographer
Wow, I'm going to have to try this!
Reply
:iconchakrabird:
chakrabird Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007
Eh, totally off topic, but everyone seems to have this cute little guy in their avatars right now. :lol: Where do they come from?
Reply
:iconslinkydink:
slinkydink Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2007   Photographer
You can find them here: [link]
Reply
:iconchakrabird:
chakrabird Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2007
Ah, thanks a lot :-)
Reply
:iconslinkydink:
slinkydink Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2007   Photographer
No problemo.
Reply
:iconnorskbarn:
NorskBarn Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2007  Professional General Artist
Thanks for this article- ever since I finished a printmaking class I've had a greater appreciation for it as an art form and I've been experimenting with silkscreen, lino prints and monotype a lot lately
Reply
:iconmajnouna:
Majnouna Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2007  Professional General Artist
"Printmaking is one of the oldest and most basic of art forms. Palaeontologists have found the oldest known "prints" when they discovered dinosaur foot impressions in earth that was once wet clay."

That statement made a stain on an otherwise wonderful article. There's no need to make such far-fetched claims, printmaking is quite honorable enough without them. A dinosaur's footprint has f-all to do with art or printmaking, unless you also maintain that a cretacean emptying his bowels was the first painter. Please. It was such a good article until that jarred your credbility.
Reply
:iconhelenparkinson:
HelenParkinson Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007
This part of my article was based on an introduction in a book titled "Handmade Prints" by Anne Desmet & Jim Anderson ISBN 0-7136-4638-1.

The exact wording in the book is "Printmaking is often wrongly considered to be a relative newcomer at the feast of artforms. In fact, having existed since the first dinosaur left an impression of its foot in wet clay, or since a caeman's soot-staned hand left its grimy mark on a rock wall, it is arguably the host at the table."

Maybe you should take your argument up with the authors of this book as well.

If your really only interested in a slanging match here then it would be best to just leave well alone and maybe concentrate your energy on your own artistic endevours.

Having said that thank you for your comments.

Have a nice day :)
Reply
:iconhelenparkinson:
HelenParkinson Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007
typo sorry in book quote -- should read "...caveman's soot-stained ...."
Reply
:iconcatharsisky:
Catharsisky Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2007
These footprints achieved far more longevity than any of the work any of us will ever create and certainly said something about who made them.

It is an example of how the very same process occurs in nature, and how it always has, the most basic type of print, and I think it helps people make that connection, that printmaking is a more complicated form of hand prints or thumb prints or those rubber stamps you get as a kid, so that they don't think of it as something detached and mechanical.
A lot of people can't stand that apparent detachment from the final product, but it's really the element of chance that makes printmaking so exciting.

It really couldn't be more relevant.
Reply
:iconmajnouna:
Majnouna Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2007  Professional General Artist
"These footprints achieved far more longevity than any of the work any of us will ever create"
Of course they have, they are not prints nor in any way related. There is no transfer, there is only impression, and they're not the same thing. Footprints in now-petrified mud are, if anything, related to molding and sculpture, which is why the example is poorly chosen. If there are any true "print" phenomena occuring spontaneously in nature, they don't actually survive. The transfer you speak of did not come into existence until someone consciously smudged mud on his hand and pressed it against a surface to create an impression. That's impressive enough and would have been a much less misleading illustration/unhappy juxtaposition of statements.

"They said something about [the dinosaurs] who made them"
Huh??
Reply
:iconcatharsisky:
Catharsisky Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007
Ok so now you admit that it would be a valid comparison were it an actual print, you say that there might be others in nature but that this is not one. You suggest that as the dinosaur did not conscientiously go out and decide to make some art that this is not a print.
Prints are impressions, that is what they are, this is a print, it's not an art print and no one claimed it was. It is a foot print. It is a type of print.
If there are any true "print" phenomena occuring spontaneously in nature, they don't actually survive.
( there are two Rs in occurring )
Foot-prints hand-prints paw-prints.

why do you think they call them prints?

I wouldn't usually encourage people to use dictionary.com as a reference but it will do here: [link]

A print is a print, it's irrelevant whether it's intentional or not. This example as I already said is related to the reality of printmaking, how it is done, and how primal a way of making a mark it is.

Again as I said before people often tend to think of print as something complicated and intimidating, and often there is a misunderstanding about the artists level of connection with the finished product because people get it confused with commercial printing or even photo-exposure in screen printing and photo-etching where you can have as much or as little do to with the image itself as you want.

This shows printmaking is possible in very basic and immediate ways, and all that makes something a print is the fact that it is a print.
The example goes towards the definition of the word print and there must have been a call for it because you yourself are confused into thinking there is more to it than that.
You actually seem to think that foot-prints aren't prints!


Huh??

You can tell obvious things from a footprint, like the size and weight of something and whether it had hairs on the souls of it's feet.
But you can also tell things like whether it walked like a cat ("four wheel drive" Or like a rabbit "Two wheel drive". Whether this particular animal was injured, limping, if you have examples of mature bones you'll know how old the animal was and the footprint will help you tell how much body mass surrounded the bones.
Reply
:iconmajnouna:
Majnouna Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007  Professional General Artist
"You suggest that as the dinosaur did not conscientiously go out and decide to make some art that this is not a print. "

No, I said it is not a print because there is no transfer. I said it is not art because it is not conscious. Do read what is written.
Reply
:iconcatharsisky:
Catharsisky Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007
1. There is a transfer. It's an embossment which is a type of print. It's called a foot [i]print[/i]. It fits every definition of print there is, it's just not an art-print.
2. If you're going to get childish and try to condescend I really don't see the point in talking to you.
Reply
:iconmajnouna:
Majnouna Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007  Professional General Artist
Pointing out you're as unclear about my words as you are about your own is far from childish. You've had your wires crossed since the beginning of this discussion, so this is a waste of my time anyway.
Reply
:iconhelenparkinson:
HelenParkinson Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007
Regardless of what you or anyone might think of my choice of example here the point of the article is to promote traditional printmaking here at DA.

What does it achieve to attack some small aspect of an article? I would agree that maybe it is a waste of your time and only serves to put others down.

Nobody, in what they might write by way of a news article is going to please all of the people all of the time.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconcatharsisky:
Catharsisky Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2007
uch, html
Reply
:iconcatharsisky:
Catharsisky Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2007
Great article! And there is such a call for it!
Reply
:iconchakrabird:
chakrabird Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2007
Excellent article, well written and great examples :clap:
Reply
:iconbear48:
bear48 Featured By Owner Jul 6, 2007  Professional
nice

:)
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×

:iconhelenparkinson: More from HelenParkinson


More from DeviantArt



Details

Submitted on
July 6, 2007
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
1,763
Favourites
45 (who?)
Comments
41
×